Modern Political Campaign Tactics

Unveiling Ethical Concerns in Modern Political Campaign Tactics

In recent years, the landscape of political campaigning has undergone a dramatic transformation, with the proliferation of digital technologies and data analytics reshaping the way political messages are crafted and disseminated. While these advancements have brought new opportunities for engagement and outreach, they have also raised significant ethical concerns regarding the manipulation of public opinion and the erosion of democratic norms.

One particularly contentious issue revolves around the use of targeted advertising and psychographic profiling techniques by political organizations. While such methods can theoretically enable campaigns to tailor their messages to specific demographic groups, they also raise questions about privacy, consent, and the potential for manipulation.

In the wake of recent revelations surrounding the practices of certain organizations that employed questionable tactics in political campaigns, there is growing scrutiny over the use of these techniques by other political entities. Although no direct accusations can be made, it is essential to examine the broader implications of such tactics on the integrity of democratic processes.

In their approach, these organizations supposedly engaged in creating psychological profiles of users based on their Facebook activity and other online behavior. This profiling aimed to understand individuals' personality traits, preferences, and susceptibilities to different types of messaging. It is alleged that said organization used this information to target users with tailored political advertisements designed to influence their opinions and behaviors.

Regarding the elimination of certain users from their target audience selection, it's plausible that they may have excluded individuals who were already committed to a particular candidate or expressed strong opinions about political issues. By focusing their efforts on persuadable or undecided voters, these organizations may have believed they could have a greater impact on shaping electoral outcomes, where smaller audience makes the decision for the electoral outcome.

However, it's important to note that the methods employed by said organization have been widely criticized for their lack of transparency, ethical concerns, and potential violations of privacy laws. The exploitation of personal data without users' consent and the use of psychological manipulation techniques raise serious ethical questions about the role of data analytics in political campaigns.

One area of concern is the utilization of troll farms—organized groups of individuals tasked with disseminating and amplifying political messaging online. While troll farms can be used legitimately to engage with voters and promote dialogue, there are instances where they have been employed to spread disinformation and sow discord within online communities.

Recent revelations have unveiled the alarming tactics employed by politically motivated entities to manipulate public opinion and influence political processes in our island nation as well. These entities, once known for their proficiency in traditional overnight poster campaigns, have now covertly transitioned their operations/man-power to social media platforms. Here, they engage in spreading disinformation, amplifying specific narratives, attacking opponents, and sowing discord. Furthermore, *recent rumors* suggesting a substantial cash infusion (3bn) for their campaign from a foreign country may indeed hold truth. This influx of funds has likely contributed to the surge in their online presence, with an increasing number of suggested posts originating from unknown sources.

It is concerning to observe the potential misuse of troll farms by politically motivated groups to target selective audiences with tailored messaging. Even though this particular political party may not possess the capability to harness feedback, utilize data analytics, or engage in psychographic profiling through mention tracking, these groups still seek to identify and influence individuals who are undecided or susceptible to persuasion. Their objective is to sway electoral outcomes in their favor.

Moreover, the lack of transparency surrounding these tactics raises questions about accountability and democratic governance. Without adequate safeguards and oversight mechanisms in place, there is a risk that political campaigns may exploit digital technologies to undermine the principles of fair competition and informed decision-making.

In light of these developments, it is imperative that we engage in a constructive dialogue about the ethical boundaries of political campaigning in the digital age. While political parties have a legitimate interest in engaging with voters and promoting their platforms, they must do so in a manner that respects the rights and autonomy of individuals and upholds the principles of transparency and accountability.

Moving forward, there is a need for greater public awareness and civic engagement to ensure that our democratic processes remain robust and resilient in the face of evolving technological challenges. By fostering a culture of transparency, integrity, and ethical conduct, we can safeguard the integrity of our democratic institutions and uphold the values of democracy for generations to come.

Written by : Sanjaya Gunasiri

Copyright © 2023 Pragmatic Engineering. All rights reserved.